Organizations and Management Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Organizations and Management - Case Study illustrationSome employees avoid interacting with members of otherwise cultures/ethnicities and/or view them as undesirable staff. This case vividly portrays that interpersonal confabulation employed by the CEO is ineffective and inefficient caused by different values and traditions of mint, and curt interaction amidst all employees. For instance, the CEO and Western employees have different perception and understanding of the family innovation of organizational culture but the CEO is unable to recognize these difficulties and problems experienced by the subordinates. The western atomic number 18 perceived as impolite and disruptive because of different communication n corms and traditions which have not been communicated and explained to Westerns people by the CEO (Wood, 2003).2. The case study vividly portrays the important role of CEO and his vision in organizational culture. Communication should be seen as a process by which knowl edge that resides in champion or more people comes to be represented in one or more others. sure enough the transfer of knowledge is not the only thing that happens in communication, and for certain purposes it may not be the most useful way of thinking about the process. Below we refer briefly to some other dimensions of communication that may be important for cooperative work. Underlying the knowledge transfer view of communication is the assumption that any communicative act rests on a base of mutual knowledge (West and food turner 2006). The example of Mainland Enterprises reveals a set of mechanisms derives from the fact that one-on-ones can often be assigned to social categories, and such(prenominal) category membership often predicts individual knowledge. Of course, category membership is not a perfect predictor of knowledge. Conversation (and similar interactive forms) permits communicators to formulate messages that ar tightly linked to the immediate knowledge and persp ectives of the individual participants, because it affords the participants moment-to-moment information on each others understanding. Such information permits the formulation of messages that are extremely efficient because they are based on a reasonably precise assessment of the hearers current knowledge and understanding. The distinction between self and other is rather a rudimentary one, but it can be shown that the Western employees divide between message recipients (Knapp and Vangelisti 2004).The problem of misperception and misunderstanding is caused by patriarchal and autocratic management style of the CEO. he does not permit freedom of choice trying to control decision-making and problem-solving within the company. These causes provide stronger support for the plebeian ground hypothesis than the relatively narrow margin of difference between the friend and stranger conditions would engineer one to conclude, because the experimental situation was one that would minimize t he likelihood of finding such differences. This situation proves that in communicating with friends and family, employees are likely to have direct and detailed knowledge of the information